There’s a lot of cross-over between the world of politics and the world of poker. It’s perhaps why I like both almostly equally.
Being successful in Poker demands effortless deception, strategy and the ability to see through your opponents strategies and deceptions. Then you need skill, knowledge and experience – in the case of Poker it’s about understanding probability and specific probabilities. You need a bit of luck too, because to be a real winner in Poker you need to be willing to take risks, to gamble. Finally, you need to exercise enormous self-discipline, because Poker is, at its heart, a game of emotional endurance – a test of who can remain rational and in control the longest.
One of the phenomenons that you see in Poker quite commonly are people who, after being especially unlucky (or especially stupid), go ‘On Tilt’. It means they lose their self control and begin taking pointless and stupid risks. They give up, in effect, and reason that they have nothing to lose – therefore they place their fate in the hands of pure chance in the hope of a miracle.
I wondered if that’s what we’re seeing in the Labour Party right now – a sort of collective madness that’s taken over in their grief and distress at returning to the bad old days of unelectability. It’s a situation that’s arisen from playing the politics game with far too much deception and reliance on chance, and not nearly enough skill or knowledge. They thought they could bluff forever – after all, most people wanted to believe them, especially within the Labour Party itself. Finding out your Government is bluffing when they claim competence and understanding is an unnerving and dislocating experience at the best of times.
But that’s not what we’re seeing. What we’re seeing is the political equivalent of a gambler chasing their losses. Each catastrophe that strikes the Government – and this last month has been one endless nightmare after another – only seems to increase Gordon’s resolve to hang on longer, to give himself time to put right the wrongs and turn things around. Just one more bet, one more really big gamble that can wipe the slate clean! Madness prevails.
Call a General Election now, with Labour at 22%? He won’t do it. He simply can’t accept that he’s utterly and comprehensively beaten, that far from being in credit with the nation he is, morally speaking, in a debt that will take many decades to repay.
Yet the country is experiencing an unprecedented crisis of confidence in the whole system of politics, and my fears of what sort of consequences this will have are making me feel distinctly uneasy – especially after another year of this sort of continuous and relentless negativity surrounding the Government.
The only real way to resolve this mess is to call a General Election, and let individual constituencies decide who should go back into parliament and who shouldn’t. It will allow us to draw a line under this whole affair and move on. The guilty will have been punished and the public’s anger will have been dissipated.
But Brown… and this Government… willing to ‘take one for the team’? Willing to admit that they are beaten, fall on their swords for the good of the whole system of parliamentary democracy in Britain? To, for once, do the decent thing?
I can’t see it happening. Brown’s one and only chance of redeeming himself and the Labour Party as a whole is to call a General Election. If he fails – if he is forced out, forcing the country to endure another year of chasing his losses and indulging his personal desires to remain Prime Minister then this opportunity is lost forever. There will be no redemption, no forgiveness – just decades in the wilderness and, potentially (and realistically) the actual, final end of the Godforsaken Labour Party.

asquith said...
15 May 09 at 3:40 pm
“individual constituencies decide who should go back into parliament and who shouldn’t”
Aye- imagine a system in which MPs had to submit themselves to their constituency party, facing challengers, at every election rather than simply being waved through if they are incumbent.
http://tinyurl.com/ovtpzh etc.
BeingMeSince1964 said...
15 May 09 at 7:55 pm
It is a feature of your average socialist mind that they are not wrong, ever, and so this is all someone else’s fault. Brown will battle on until the bitter end.
And then invoke ‘emergency powers’ due to ‘a national crisis’ and ‘postpone’ a General Election. Because he’s not wrong. And it’s all someone else’s fault.
Charlotte Gore said...
15 May 09 at 11:19 pm
Isn’t it worrying that there’s lots of people that seem genuinely worried that Brown might not give up power at all? It worries me.
Anduril Sword of Ranger said...
16 May 09 at 6:51 am
Cheney; Asscroft…
See you and raise you 300…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTMi-yuOcH4
Ever,
Anduríl
Simon said...
16 May 09 at 7:39 am
Can you imagine what the feelings will be by next year? What I reckon could happen is that the whole lot of them will just decide that they are so far beyond redemption that they might as well punish us for having the gall to read about their corruption.
If they decide to go on a serial law making spree passing all sorts of legislation to repress us even more there isn’t much we could do about it. Plus they’ve got their pet Police to enforce it.
Look here, the Police are being allowed to award themselves massive bonuses. They are going to be willing to keep us under the cosh (literally) to protect that. http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kentonline/news/2009/may/14/kent_police_bonuses.aspx
Wayne Lawrence said...
16 May 09 at 10:05 am
I reflect upon the year 1973 in my days in Oz with some nostalgia, when the Governor General sacked the Labor PM and dissolved parliament.
Would Her Maj ever do something so sensible?
Charlotte – ‘final end of the Godforsaken Labour Party’ – just the thought of it brightened my day.
james said...
16 May 09 at 9:13 pm
I suspect there is a 20% chance the cabinet will gang up on Brown after the elections in June and that Alan Johnson will become Labour leader, and then have a general election shortly afterwards. So, what price an election in September?
Matthew Huntbach said...
17 May 09 at 12:51 am
Call a general election and then what?
Why is everyone saying “call a general election” as if in the month or so between one being called and the election day everything will be sorted out and people will know what they want?
Most people will just say “a plague on both your houses” and won’t vote at all. The same PPCs that are already in place will stay in place. Minority parties may get a bigger share of the vote, but I doubt enough to win many seats – and we know from past experience (e.g. look at the UKIP and ex-UKIP MEPs) that, if they do, the main thing they do is show up that actually the selection procedures of the main parties do work to give some sort of sanity/decency check.
Calling a general election now won’t resolve a thing. Giving time for this thing to settle down and for some sort of decent response to it evolve – from where, who knows, but could it be us? – might.