<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Europe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html</link>
	<description>Free Trade and Free Minds. Politics for Reasonable People. Independent Political Blogging. Top 20 Blog. Libertarianism. Laser Kitties.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 21:47:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: richb</title>
		<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/comment-page-1#comment-4391</link>
		<dc:creator>richb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlottegore.com/?p=1137#comment-4391</guid>
		<description>@Niklas Smith: Thank you for posting that-I had not viewed that video before. The Conservative policy appears to be self-serving, by offering the prospect of a referendum on the Lisbon treaty it appeases the Euro sceptics while maintaining the current position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Niklas Smith: Thank you for posting that-I had not viewed that video before. The Conservative policy appears to be self-serving, by offering the prospect of a referendum on the Lisbon treaty it appeases the Euro sceptics while maintaining the current position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian B</title>
		<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/comment-page-1#comment-4390</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlottegore.com/?p=1137#comment-4390</guid>
		<description>It does have to be a straight in or out question. Either you want to be in a federal EU and wholeheartedly pursuing that goal, or not. There isn&#039;t another option on the table, and neither in fact should there be. The EU was set up with this particular integration-&gt;federation-&gt;nationhood objective in mind, and that is what people need to decide on. And everyone needs to be honest about it.

I used to be pro EU. A federalist, in fact. I was so because of the idea, which I now believe to be mistaken, but which is a popular fallacy, that a &quot;higher power&quot; could effectively save us from ourselves- that is, that the higher power could prevent abuses by our national government. I now think the opposite, recognising that it just boots the problem one level higher- a larger bloc just means abuses come from the higher level and are even more difficult to prevent.

But never have I doubted that the intention of the EU was to create a new federal nation, and I think that is incontrovertible. The organ grinders need to be honest about that, insteading of parading monkeys before us who deny it, and the peoples of Europe need to each make a decision on the future based on reality, not propaganda and spin. And that decision must either be withdrawal or wholehearted cooperation. As such, the Tory approach is worse than useless. As the Tories usually are, in fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does have to be a straight in or out question. Either you want to be in a federal EU and wholeheartedly pursuing that goal, or not. There isn&#8217;t another option on the table, and neither in fact should there be. The EU was set up with this particular integration-&gt;federation-&gt;nationhood objective in mind, and that is what people need to decide on. And everyone needs to be honest about it.</p>
<p>I used to be pro EU. A federalist, in fact. I was so because of the idea, which I now believe to be mistaken, but which is a popular fallacy, that a &#8220;higher power&#8221; could effectively save us from ourselves- that is, that the higher power could prevent abuses by our national government. I now think the opposite, recognising that it just boots the problem one level higher- a larger bloc just means abuses come from the higher level and are even more difficult to prevent.</p>
<p>But never have I doubted that the intention of the EU was to create a new federal nation, and I think that is incontrovertible. The organ grinders need to be honest about that, insteading of parading monkeys before us who deny it, and the peoples of Europe need to each make a decision on the future based on reality, not propaganda and spin. And that decision must either be withdrawal or wholehearted cooperation. As such, the Tory approach is worse than useless. As the Tories usually are, in fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas Smith</title>
		<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/comment-page-1#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlottegore.com/?p=1137#comment-4389</guid>
		<description>@richb: Actually, I&#039;m beginning to think Nick Clegg has a point when he argues that it should be just a straight &quot;in or out&quot; question. In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=190159155143&quot; title=&quot;European Elections: Your Questions&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this video&lt;/a&gt; he argues persuasively that the Conservatives are hoodwinking anti-EU voters into thinking that refusing to ratify Lisbon will make things better; in fact it wouldn&#039;t - the EU would keep going as before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@richb: Actually, I&#8217;m beginning to think Nick Clegg has a point when he argues that it should be just a straight &#8220;in or out&#8221; question. In <a href="http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=190159155143" title="European Elections: Your Questions" rel="nofollow">this video</a> he argues persuasively that the Conservatives are hoodwinking anti-EU voters into thinking that refusing to ratify Lisbon will make things better; in fact it wouldn&#8217;t &#8211; the EU would keep going as before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richb</title>
		<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/comment-page-1#comment-4387</link>
		<dc:creator>richb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlottegore.com/?p=1137#comment-4387</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Why should they? I think one can reasonably argue that this is a consequence of the way Theeu is portrayed. EUphobes argue that Theeu is a new state, a government which rules over us, and this is constantly denied by EUphiles, who cling to a Big Lie in public that it’s just a trade organisation with a few frills and nothing to get excited about.&quot;&gt; (Hopefully the XHTML will work this time)

I agree that the misleading arguments of both the &quot;pro&quot; and the &quot;anti&quot; sides of the debate are unhelpful.

An actual referendum on EU membership would be a good first step to reducing voter apathy-perhaps with three choices-Continue in the EU and Ratify the Lisbon treaty, Continue in EU-but no Lisbon treaty, withdrawal from the EU-negotiate a trade agreement. 

It&#039;s highly unlikely that this will ever actually occur though, as neither the Conservative or Labour parties would ever support it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="Why should they? I think one can reasonably argue that this is a consequence of the way Theeu is portrayed. EUphobes argue that Theeu is a new state, a government which rules over us, and this is constantly denied by EUphiles, who cling to a Big Lie in public that it’s just a trade organisation with a few frills and nothing to get excited about."><p> (Hopefully the XHTML will work this time)</p>
<p>I agree that the misleading arguments of both the &#8220;pro&#8221; and the &#8220;anti&#8221; sides of the debate are unhelpful.</p>
<p>An actual referendum on EU membership would be a good first step to reducing voter apathy-perhaps with three choices-Continue in the EU and Ratify the Lisbon treaty, Continue in EU-but no Lisbon treaty, withdrawal from the EU-negotiate a trade agreement. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s highly unlikely that this will ever actually occur though, as neither the Conservative or Labour parties would ever support it.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian B</title>
		<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/comment-page-1#comment-4386</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlottegore.com/?p=1137#comment-4386</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;70% of the population chose not to vote&lt;/i&gt;

Why should they? I think one can reasonably argue that this is a consequence of the way Theeu is portrayed. EUphobes argue that Theeu is a new state, a government which rules over us, and this is constantly denied by EUphiles, who cling to a Big Lie in public that it&#039;s just a trade organisation with a few frills and nothing to get excited about.

But if it&#039;s not the European government, why bother voting for its &quot;parliament&quot;? We are assured it&#039;s no big deal by tbe Big Lie. Indeed, anyone accusing Theeu of being a State is in turn accused of that heresy of being a racistandxenophobe. So the vast majority are dissuaded from taking an interest, and European elections are only of interest to crazed EUphiles and angry EUphobes.

The best way to encourage people to vote for the toy parliament would be to say &quot;this is the government now, these people run your lives&quot;. But Theeu and its useful idiots dare not say that, insisting instead that the provincial parliaments are still sovereign and Theeu is just a dull trade organisation. So the message is &quot;you should take great interest and vote for this thing which doesn&#039;t matter&quot;. Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>70% of the population chose not to vote</i></p>
<p>Why should they? I think one can reasonably argue that this is a consequence of the way Theeu is portrayed. EUphobes argue that Theeu is a new state, a government which rules over us, and this is constantly denied by EUphiles, who cling to a Big Lie in public that it&#8217;s just a trade organisation with a few frills and nothing to get excited about.</p>
<p>But if it&#8217;s not the European government, why bother voting for its &#8220;parliament&#8221;? We are assured it&#8217;s no big deal by tbe Big Lie. Indeed, anyone accusing Theeu of being a State is in turn accused of that heresy of being a racistandxenophobe. So the vast majority are dissuaded from taking an interest, and European elections are only of interest to crazed EUphiles and angry EUphobes.</p>
<p>The best way to encourage people to vote for the toy parliament would be to say &#8220;this is the government now, these people run your lives&#8221;. But Theeu and its useful idiots dare not say that, insisting instead that the provincial parliaments are still sovereign and Theeu is just a dull trade organisation. So the message is &#8220;you should take great interest and vote for this thing which doesn&#8217;t matter&#8221;. Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richb</title>
		<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/comment-page-1#comment-4385</link>
		<dc:creator>Richb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlottegore.com/?p=1137#comment-4385</guid>
		<description>The turnout for the election was around 30% it appears (Taken from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/elections/euro/09/html/ukregion_38.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;. 
Really the reason that we now have the dubious pleasure of being represented by this party is because 70% of the population chose not to vote. 

While the argument could be made that the list of candidates was not an appealing one, I am incredulous at the thought that none of them were worthy of being voted for.

The 70% of the population which didn&#039;t vote can not now blush at the fact that they are represented by the BNP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The turnout for the election was around 30% it appears (Taken from the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/elections/euro/09/html/ukregion_38.stm" rel="nofollow">.<br />
Really the reason that we now have the dubious pleasure of being represented by this party is because 70% of the population chose not to vote. </p>
<p>While the argument could be made that the list of candidates was not an appealing one, I am incredulous at the thought that none of them were worthy of being voted for.</p>
<p>The 70% of the population which didn&#8217;t vote can not now blush at the fact that they are represented by the BNP.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte Gore</title>
		<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/comment-page-1#comment-4384</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlottegore.com/?p=1137#comment-4384</guid>
		<description>Obo, yes, it&#039;s kinda ironic. Horrible to be joining in with the EU fascism business.

Blackacre, just wait until the Tories get in and watch the libertarian blogosphere turn on them almost instantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obo, yes, it&#8217;s kinda ironic. Horrible to be joining in with the EU fascism business.</p>
<p>Blackacre, just wait until the Tories get in and watch the libertarian blogosphere turn on them almost instantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackacre</title>
		<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/comment-page-1#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlottegore.com/?p=1137#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>Really sad that the only winners in this election are the nutters of UKIP and the racists of BNP.  Sad also that the Conservatives are moving from a sensible centre right mainstream party in the parliament to the extremes sitting with or near this lot.  It is to me further proof that however bad the Labour government is, the Tories will try hard to trump it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really sad that the only winners in this election are the nutters of UKIP and the racists of BNP.  Sad also that the Conservatives are moving from a sensible centre right mainstream party in the parliament to the extremes sitting with or near this lot.  It is to me further proof that however bad the Labour government is, the Tories will try hard to trump it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas Smith</title>
		<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/comment-page-1#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlottegore.com/?p=1137#comment-4381</guid>
		<description>@Obnoxio The Clown: So free trade, freedom of movement and (in much of Europe) passport-free travel, and decades of peace are all fascist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Obnoxio The Clown: So free trade, freedom of movement and (in much of Europe) passport-free travel, and decades of peace are all fascist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obnoxio The Clown</title>
		<link>http://charlottegore.com/2009/06/07/dear-europe.html/comment-page-1#comment-4380</link>
		<dc:creator>Obnoxio The Clown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlottegore.com/?p=1137#comment-4380</guid>
		<description>&quot;Xenophobia&quot;.

Is this post ironic? Because I don&#039;t know of a more fascist (in the classic sense) institution than the EU, myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Xenophobia&#8221;.</p>
<p>Is this post ironic? Because I don&#8217;t know of a more fascist (in the classic sense) institution than the EU, myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

