How did I miss this story? Someone finds a sawn off shotgun in his garden and hands it into the police to be disposed of safely, at which point he’s then arrested, charged and now convicted for possessing a firearm. He faces a minimum of 5 years.

It’s a clear miscarriage of justice. The man’s life is ruined because he tried to do the right thing. What reasonable person would believe this is the correct outcome in this case?

Apparently Stuart Sharpe’s not bothered, causing Devil’s Kitchen (and in fairness, myself) to stare open mouthed and incredulous, at his response.

In court, the prosecution said:

“The intention of anybody possessing a firearm is irrelevant.”

… which sounds fantastically tough and politically wonderful, but in the real world a case has been found which undermines public confidence in this. Clearly it’s not irrelevant, except to politicians who set these rules.

Anyone can see that taking a firearm to a police station isn’t something society should be punishing with 5 years in prison. The law is unjust and wrong – because it allows no other possible outcome –  but what politicians will dare stand up for a rethink of the firearm possession rules?

I think none, so Paul Clark is going to rot. And my friend Stuart and others are fine with that. Not amused.