The Charlotte Gore Blog

Free Trade and Free Minds. Politics for Reasonable People. Independent Political Blogging. Top 20 Blog. Libertarianism. Laser Kitties.

Archive for the ‘conservatives’ tag

Let’s Lurch Right!

April 21st, 2010 at 10:31 am

Are you ready for the new 'positive' message?

wibble

Are the Tories really about to “lurch right” at the last minute? Assuming the poster is for real, that is. Considering the quality and message it could be something only ever intended to be seen by readers of Conservative Home, to cheer them up. I really hope that’s the case. I really, really do.

First of all, let’s consider the message itself: “Let’s cut benefits for those who refuse work.” This policy is not shocking. Labour’s own manifesto says:

We will end for good the concept of a life on benefit by offering all those unemployed for more than two years work they must accept

The only real difference here is that the Tories have the guts to be specific about what “must accept” might mean. What about Labour? Removal of benefits altogether? Prison? Labour camps? At this point it’s anyone’s guess. Labour won’t be making a poster about their policy, either.

But it does provoke an obvious question: Is David Cameron still in charge of the Conservative Party’s message? Whether the four years of ‘decontamination’ has really worked remains to be seen, but this new message couldn’t be more explicit in saying, “No more Mr Nice Guy.”

Has the crisis in the polls and the firm, sharp, swift kick in the nuts that the electorate appears determined to inflict on both him and Brown caused what always happens to leaders when the troops become disillusioned and demoralised: They lose control. The troops mutiny and rivals begin to flex their muscles. Someone, somewhere, is in desperate need to bolster the Tory core vote and they’re getting their way. If Cameron’s behind this it’s a humiliating retreat into comfortable Tory territory and a pre-emptive admission that the last four years have been a mistake. Alternatively it looks like Cameron’s lost control of the message, or possibly worse that no-one at Tory HQ understands just how badly this sort of message plays with non-Core Tories. With apologies to my Tory friends, this doesn’t look good.

What’s tragic about this whole affair is that if Labour had said the same thing (and, you know, they have) they don’t endure the label of The Nasty Party. That’s because no-one seriously believes that Labour are in politics to punish the poorest people in society for their failures – whereas, true or not, people do actually believe that about the Conservatives. The decontamination strategy was supposed to change people’s minds about what the motives behind Tory policies are. The measure of its success would be their ability to get away with messages like this. But surely testing the credibility of the decontaminated brand is something you do during the second term, not before the General Election?

Time to get the popcorn out and wait and see.

UPDATE: Just to make it absolutely clear, I don’t have a problem with the policy. I actually admire any party that has the guts to tackle welfare reform. My point, in a nutshell, is that the Tories want to win, and that means appealing to more than just natural Conservatives. It means appealing to more people than they’ve ever appealed to before… this seems counterproductive.

Delusional? Really?

November 23rd, 2009 at 2:40 pm

Sure, laugh at the Labourites who think they've got a chance of winning. It makes you look really big and clever.

Tory Bear pointed his twitter followers in the direction of this propaganda piece in the New Statesman that claims, without verification or corroboration that private polling inside Number 10 shows Labour will overtake the Conservatives in the polls by the end of the year. Cue much hilarity and mocking.

“Neil Kinnock wrote the first version of  Windows and sold it to Microsoft to raise the money for their 1992 General Election campaign!”

But, let’s put the ‘outrageous whoppers’ meme aside. The New Statesman piece is more appropriate material for Valentines day than a hung-over Monday. It features a photograph of Gordon showing a bit of teeth, and features the decidedly on-message, head-office approved language of fighting. The author seems practically giddy with excitement. Labour! 4th Term! Win! Yes!

It all adds up: The fight-back has begun! Of course, cynics might point out that this is the same fight-back they’ve been trying to start since “Barnacle Brown” decided not to hold a General Election, and that the changes in the polling might have more to do with the the Tories being annoyingly certain about their impending victory in the media.

However – big however – as delusional as the New Statesman piece might be the simple fact remains that Labour can win the next general election. It’s possible.

As Tory Bear’s chums pile into the comments thread, they don’t realise that they’re actually helping Labour. The more attention they draw to it, the worse it’ll get. Assuming that Labour winning is impossible, that victory for the Tories is a dead certainty? That, above all else, is Labour’s one real chance of winning.

The biggest problem facing opponents of Labour remains 1001 things to criticise them for and a general inability to stick to one specific area and hammer it to death, and a general reluctance for anyone to spell out specifically what the alternatives might be. Too much public spending? Well the solution is mutter mutter mutter. Too much CCTV and control freakery? The solution is obviously mumble thingy wotsit, isn’t it? Taxes are too high? Well, obviously we need to mutter, mumble mumble waffle and blah.

Wait, what were those solutions again? Not one of the naughty, forbidden solutions that don’t involve more public spending, more regulation, more centralisation, more crimes, more punishments, more interference in people’s private lives and choices?

The response usually comes, “Well, let’s be clear about what we’re saying here: Mumble mumble mumble.”

If the campaign is going to be about pure personality and style over real policy, and if real policy debate is reduced to ‘we’re going to introduce the same policy but on a slightly different timescale with slightly different amounts of money with slightly different numbers of public sector workers” then you’d better have one seriously charming personality and be very stylish indeed.

So this General Election, rather than being a foregone conclusion, could well be building up into what counts as the mother of all fuck-ups for the Conservatives. Will they be able to reign in the triumphalism in time? Is it even possible to rein in the triumphalism of the Tory blogosphere?

So sorry, Tory Bear. I’m going to do you a favour and not join in the ‘lynch the New Statesman for being thick’ gang. I mean, they are thick and their post is pathetic, but that doesn’t mean Labour can’t beat you.

Hello you. I'm a semi-professional writer and this is my blog about politics and pop culture.

There's a Twitter feed as well.

You can email, too.

More from the Blog

Lib Dems: Blowing it here.

There's no referendum the Lib Dems could support that would win.

Magic and Kittens Socialism

In which I write stuff that people who already agree with me will agree with, and those that disagree will disagree.

The Revolution Will Be Commentated

You wanna know what I think?

Mortality

Need to get this out of my system.

The Big Society Bank Experiment

Don't worry. No-one gets the Big Society.

Sort Of Best Of

A hand picked selection of interesting content

Archives

For the truly committed